Perpetual Yield

Recursive royalty rights for derivative works

Financial stateP1

Perpetual Yield

Recursive royalty rights for derivative works. Creators lose attribution and revenue when content is remixed, sampled, or reused across platforms.

Perpetual Yield is strongest when treated as a governed state machine, not a static token. The object must carry enough identity to be trusted at mint, enough mutable state to reflect the real workflow, and enough audit history for a third party to decide whether the current state is reliable.

Strategic thesis

Why this wedge exists

Derivative works can inherit royalty obligations from source objects while preserving a traceable chain of rights.

The first buyer is Creative platforms, rights owners, and licensing networks. They don't need a generic blockchain story; they need a way to reduce disputes, speed approval, and make the current status of a workflow independently checkable.

State Dual manages

Original work, derivative chain, royalty percentages, usage events, disputes, and payout state.

CreatedActive EarningDerivative CreatedUsage ReportedRoyalty AccruedPaid

The important point is not the number of states. It's that each transition has an actor, an allowed action, evidence, and a durable audit record. That turns operational workflow into an inspectable object.

Token architecture

Immutable identityinstrument_id, issuer_id, counterparty_set, legal_wrapper_hash, created_at
Mutable statefunding_status, approval_status, accrued_amount, settlement_status, last_payment_at
Compliance rulesPayout requires all prerequisite evidence to be present. Transfer or payment can be blocked by role, jurisdiction, limit, or expiry. Every value change records actor, timestamp, and source event.
Event sourcespayment rail confirmation, bank or escrow status, approval workflow, invoice, claim, meter, or revenue event

Example object schema

{
  "template": "perpetual_yield",
  "category": "Financial state",
  "immutable": {
    "instrument_id": "set_at_mint",
    "issuer_id": "set_at_mint",
    "counterparty_set": "set_at_mint",
    "legal_wrapper_hash": "set_at_mint",
    "created_at": "set_at_mint"
  },
  "mutable": {
    "funding_status": "updated_by_event",
    "approval_status": "updated_by_event",
    "accrued_amount": "updated_by_event",
    "settlement_status": "updated_by_event",
    "last_payment_at": "updated_by_event"
  },
  "rules": {
    "allowed_states": ["Created","Active Earning","Derivative Created","Usage Reported","Royalty Accrued","Paid"],
    "first_buyer": "Creative platforms, rights owners, and licensing networks",
    "audit_required": true
  }
}

This schema is intentionally scoped. A credible first product should prove one object type, one core state machine, and a small number of high-value integrations before expanding into a platform.

User journey

  1. 1

    Issuer: Created

    The Perpetual Yield object is created with immutable identity, owner, and rule metadata.

  2. 2

    Operator: Active Earning

    An event moves the object into "Active Earning", preserving the previous state and the actor that triggered the change.

  3. 3

    Verifier: Derivative Created

    An event moves the object into "Derivative Created", preserving the previous state and the actor that triggered the change.

  4. 4

    Counterparty: Usage Reported

    An event moves the object into "Usage Reported", preserving the previous state and the actor that triggered the change.

  5. 5

    Auditor: Royalty Accrued

    An event moves the object into "Royalty Accrued", preserving the previous state and the actor that triggered the change.

  6. 6

    Automation: Paid

    An event moves the object into "Paid", preserving the previous state and the actor that triggered the change.

Event model

Dual becomes useful when outside systems stop being passive records and start becoming evidence sources for state transitions.

  • payment rail confirmation
  • bank or escrow status
  • approval workflow
  • invoice, claim, meter, or revenue event

Each event should answer four questions: who produced it, which object it affects, which transition it requests, and which proof should be retained for audit.

Why not just a database?

Traditional system

A rights database can track contracts, but it rarely propagates royalty state automatically across derivative chains.

That's acceptable when one organization owns the full workflow. It breaks down when multiple parties need to trust the same current state without relying on a single application owner.

Dual stateful object

Dual separates immutable identity, mutable lifecycle state, compliance checks, and event history. Participants can inspect the current object state, verify the transition path, and use the same state as input to payment, access, reporting, or downstream automation.

90-day MVP

One original work, two derivative works, one usage event, and an automatic royalty split.

  • Define the template and allowed state transitions.
  • Mint test objects with realistic identity and ownership data.
  • Wire one external event source into the Event Bus.
  • Trigger one successful transition and one rejected transition.
  • Expose a query view that proves current state and transition history.

Proof assets required

  • Derivative graph
  • Royalty split
  • Dispute state
  • Usage event

These assets are the difference between a concept note and a buildable wedge. Without them, the page is only a narrative; with them, it becomes a product specification.

Operating metrics

  • time to settlement
  • manual reconciliation avoided
  • dispute rate
  • approved value processed

These are the metrics that should be visible in the pilot dashboard. They also give sales, implementation, and investor conversations a concrete way to judge whether Dual is improving the workflow.

Commercial wedge

The first commercial motion should sell a narrow operational outcome, not broad tokenization. For Perpetual Yield, the wedge is: trace royalty chain. Price around the workflow value: fewer disputes, faster settlement, cleaner audit, lower fraud, or lower manual reconciliation.

Expansion should follow the state graph. Once the first transition is trusted, add the next actor, then the next integration, then the next reporting surface. That keeps the product grounded in workflow proof rather than speculative asset creation.

Risks and controls

  • legal treatment of the entitlement. Control: define the trusted source, log every mutation, and keep manual override paths explicit.
  • payment rail integration complexity. Control: define the trusted source, log every mutation, and keep manual override paths explicit.
  • counterparty onboarding friction. Control: define the trusted source, log every mutation, and keep manual override paths explicit.

Implementation playbook

  1. Map the workflow: identify the actor responsible for each state and the evidence required for each transition.
  2. Create the template: split data into immutable identity, mutable state, and compliance rule fields.
  3. Mint sample objects: use realistic IDs, timestamps, owners, and source-system references.
  4. Connect one event: choose the event that makes the state change economically valuable.
  5. Reject one bad action: demonstrate that Dual blocks invalid transitions before downstream settlement.
  6. Expose audit: show current state, previous state, actor, timestamp, evidence hash, and rule result.

Build prompt

Create a Dual template for Perpetual Yield. Model immutable identity fields, mutable lifecycle state, compliance checks, and event inputs. Then emit one test object and move it through: Created → Active Earning → Derivative Created → Usage Reported → Royalty Accrued.

Include:
- object schema
- transition rules
- event payload examples
- one rejected transition
- audit query output
- MVP dashboard fields

Use this as a scoped wedge: prove one governed state transition, one external event, and one audit query before expanding the workflow.

Start with the Dual quickstart →